Academics accuse UCL of setting off Bartlett ‘witch hunt’

A group of high-profile architects and academics has accused University College London (UCL) of setting off a “witch hunt” of staff at the Bartlett school of architecture by current and former students.

The group, which includes Amin Taha, said that UCL’s decision to publish abombshell report into alleged abuses at the schoolbefore the conclusion of a disciplinary process had led to staff being subjected to a “wave of denunciations”.

In an open letter, published in full below, the group expressed its solidarity with “the majority of decent and talented teachers” which it said had been named on social media blacklists inspired by the report.

It added that student activists were demanding that more than 83 members of staff should be sacked for “unspoken crimes”.

It also said that UCL had launched a “Kafkaesque” investigation of staff in which “those accused don’t know what they are accused of or who has made the accusations”.

Nearly 30 architects and academics have signed the letter, including Royal Academy of Arts head of architecture and Heinz curator Vicky Richardson and architect Piers Gough.

UCL suspended a number of Bartlett staff following the publication of the 120-page report, which was published earlier this month, and apologised for a “culture of unacceptable behaviour” spanning decades.

The school’s director Bob Sheil alsotook a “personal decision” to step down in response to the report. He had been due to leave his post at the end of this academic year ahead of US academic Amy Kulper starting her tenure in September.

It followed an investigation by intelligence firm Howlett Brown into allegations of bullying, racism and sexism.

>> Also read:Bartlett suspends staff as investigation uncovers ‘toxic’ culture lasting decades

The report described a “toxic culture” led by a circle of staff which was alleged to have created a “boys’ club”, with one senior staff member mentioned 27 times for a range of abuses including anti-semitism.

UCL also said it had launched a review of the school’s crit process, which the report identified as a significant source of “upset and fear” for students, to ensure it is made “fully equitable and inclusive”.

The picture of the school painted by Howlett Brown and UCL has been challenged by the open letter, which described the crit process as “important in preparing students for the practice of architecture”.

信中还说，该学科中隐含的“创作张力”只能通过公开展览和审查来探索。它表示，“绝大多数批评都是教育性的、有成效的和支持性的”，而“长期反对这一进程的活动人士”正垄断着一种“非常狭隘的话语”。

The group also questioned the report’s descriptions of improper staff behaviour, arguing that it had conflated serious accusations of sexism, racism and bullying with “trivial claims about informal staff-student socialising”.

超过三分之一的受访者告诉豪利特布朗大学，他们目睹或听说过员工滥用职权，包括与学生发生亲密关系。

One current staff member said that there was a “weird boys’ club” who had been dating students. Another staff member alleged it was “common knowledge that two [junior members of staff] had stayed out with the students and slept with one of the students”.

The open letter said “cultivating fear and recriminations will not resolve the problems that exist at UCL”, and called on the university’s management to “end this public spectacle which is masquerading as a disciplinary process”.

UCL, in its statement following the report, said that the culture of bad behaviour at the school “comes against the context of longstanding problems with the culture of the architecture sector more widely”.

The university added that it is “fiercely committed to lasting, root-and-branch change” and it had issued invitations to other institutions and to practising architects inviting them to tackle issues which had been highlighted in the Bartlett report.

记者联系了伦敦大学学院请其置评。